AT&T chief executive John Stankey has again played down the threat from SpaceX’s Starlink, telling Axios that nothing beats fiber and that the satellite plan is neither economically nor technically feasible, according to a report published on 11 October by ainvest, which also relays his claim that fiber is three times faster than satellite.
His remarks followed an early-October spectrum deal that ainvest says knocked about 7% off AT&T’s share price in a single afternoon — before SpaceX had added a single customer to a wireless network.
What SpaceX has bought and been cleared to do
SpaceX’s agreement to buy 800 MHz airwaves from the investment firm Grain Management was followed days later by the FCC, the US communications regulator, which cleared a next-generation Starlink Mobile constellation. Low-band frequencies travel farther and penetrate walls better than satellite frequencies, ainvest says, which is why the purchase matters more than its size suggests.
The numbers behind the week, and who reported them:
- Spectrum: up to 14 MHz of 800 MHz airwaves from Grain Management, in a deal valued at around $8 billion (ainvest).
- Satellites: FCC clearance for 15,000 next-generation satellites with more than 100 times the bandwidth of the current fleet (ainvest).
- Starlink subscribers: about 12 million on the existing satellite internet service (ainvest).
- Cost of matching a carrier on the ground: $100 billion or more in terrestrial sites, attributed to unnamed analysts (ainvest).
- AT&T fiber: 8 million new locations planned in 2026, including 4 million acquired from the US telecoms operator Lumen (PC Magazine); a footprint heading toward 60 million locations by 2030 through a joint venture with Global Infrastructure Partners and CPP Investments (ainvest).
- Bundling: 40.5% of AT&T Fiber customers also subscribed to AT&T wireless at the end of the second quarter (ainvest).
On SpaceX’s first earnings call since going public this year, President Gwynne Shotwell said she expected to take “quite a few” customers from traditional wireless carriers because Starlink’s service would be better, ainvest reports.
The outlet is more cautious than Shotwell. It treats the spectrum and the licence together as permission to enter wireless rather than a service that has taken anyone, and calls a spectrum authorisation a ceiling rather than a fact on the ground. It adds a regulatory obstacle it credits to Stankey: authorities do not let a homeowner radiate cellular signals without permission.
What this changes for Starlink customers
Very little yet, and that is the part the stock story buries. Clearance to launch satellites is a step before a product, not the product.
What we don’t know yet:
- Starlink Mobile pricing, or whether it will sell as a standalone plan or an add-on
- a launch date or commercial availability window
- the countries or US states where it will be sold first
- whether it is aimed only at dead zones or at mainstream carrier coverage
What is already on sale is the satellite internet service, which PC Magazine describes as the major ISP in rural and remote areas with limited or no access to fiber and 5G. Writing in July, PC Magazine reported that SpaceX is preparing 5G connectivity direct to phones over the next-generation constellation, promising speeds of up to 150Mbps, and is separately working on a gigabit upgrade to the home product. For an existing dish owner, the dispute with AT&T changes neither the hardware nor the bill; we track Starlink price and availability changes as they are announced.
AT&T’s argument: infrastructure, not orbit
Stankey’s July case to CNBC rested on decades of ground investment. New entrants “have to catch up with substantial amounts of infrastructure investment that’s been going on for decades,” he said, listing hospitals, university campuses, stadiums and tall buildings as places customers now expect service to work, per Yahoo Finance. PC Magazine notes it is unclear whether space-based 5G can penetrate buildings made of concrete and metal.
He was equally direct on the home product. “We have the best broadband product that’s out there…built on the foundation of fiber,” he told CNBC, adding that where AT&T has fiber it wins, and that once the infrastructure is in place there is no customer that should not be AT&T’s, according to Yahoo Finance. He pointed to symmetrical gigabit and multi-gigabit services and a segment of the population willing to pay for that performance.
T-Mobile, the third big US carrier, went further. Its chief financial officer said:
“You can have a million satellites up there with all the spectrum in the world; you can’t break the fundamental laws of physics.”
That quote reaches this story through ainvest rather than from T-Mobile directly.
Why the market sold anyway
The wireless book, not broadband speeds
Ainvest argues the selloff had nothing to do with broadband speeds. Wireless postpaid customers are the single biggest driver of AT&T’s revenue and its steadiest cash, the outlet says, and that is the business supporting a dividend yield its own data puts above 6%. On that reading, Stankey is defending fiber while the market sold the carriers on wireless.
The fiber spend and the bundle
AT&T is also spending heavily on the network he says cannot be beaten: PC Magazine called 2026 the company’s largest year ever for fiber expansion. The bundling rate is where the two businesses meet, and ainvest reads it as AT&T defending its wireless book through fiber.
The test that follows: if Starlink Mobile only serves dead zones the incumbents do not cover, it is a complement; if it starts taking price-sensitive subscribers where AT&T already has good coverage, the cash flow funding the dividend is what gets hurt.
Where the sources differ
Yahoo Finance and PC Magazine relay Stankey’s claims largely as he made them, with PC Magazine adding the one technical doubt about in-building penetration; neither tests his three-times-faster figure or asks what share of AT&T’s footprint is actually fiber rather than fixed wireless. Ainvest accepts the physics but says it is aimed at a target nobody is attacking, since the satellite internet product was built for places fiber does not reach — then argues the market repriced the wireless business regardless.
None of them has the number that would settle it: no reported Starlink Mobile subscriber in a market AT&T already covers. Both sides are arguing from spectrum maps and capital budgets rather than from anything a customer has bought.
How this story is sourced
Ainvest, a financial-content outlet, is the sole source here for the share-price move, the $8 billion deal value, the 14 MHz figure, the satellite count, the dividend yield, the $100 billion build estimate, the 12-million subscriber count and the Axios and T-Mobile quotes. None of those has been matched against a second outlet or against the primary documents — the Axios interview, the FCC’s authorisation on its own docket and AT&T’s quarterly filings — and the per-megahertz precision of the spectrum figure should be read as the outlet’s characterisation, not a confirmed term of the deal. The independently reported figures used above come from PC Magazine (the 2026 fiber build, the Lumen locations, the 150Mbps direct-to-phone target and the quarterly customer adds) and Yahoo Finance (Stankey’s CNBC quotes).
Frequently Asked Questions
Has AT&T considered reselling Starlink to cover its own dead zones?
No. Stankey told CNBC in July that he does not need a wholesale arrangement to reach the roughly 2% of traffic he cannot serve today, because AT&T reaches 98% of it, according to Yahoo Finance. In his words, quoted by Yahoo Finance: “So I’m not prone to looking for a wholesale agreement for a problem I don’t have.”
Is AT&T backing any satellite-to-phone operator of its own?
Yes. PC Magazine reported that AT&T has already invested in AST SpaceMobile, a Texas-based SpaceX rival working to launch its own version of Starlink Mobile. Writing in July 2026, PC Magazine said that launch was expected sometime next year.
How fast is AT&T’s own broadband business growing?
AT&T added 367,000 fiber customers and 279,000 fixed wireless users in the second quarter, PC Magazine reported.
Follow Starlink News on Google. Make us a preferred source to see more of our reporting in Google search results.
![Using Your Own Router with Starlink: Bypass Mode [2026]](https://starlink-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/using-your-own-router-with-starlink-bypass-mode-20-f6c09f95-120x86.png)
