Ukraine has placed the first test satellite of a planned national communications network in orbit, according to a report published on 27 October by the news agency EADaily. That report is, as far as we can establish, the only published account of the launch — and its provenance deserves stating up front. EADaily attributes the story to what it calls “the Military portal”, which it does not link; it quotes no published statement from either company it names; and its own site notice says it uses recommendation technologies aimed at internet users located in the Russian Federation. A Russian-audience outlet, relaying an unlinked third party, is an unusual sole record for a Ukrainian military-adjacent space programme.
On that account, the spacecraft is named OBRIA NANO and was launched on 1 October 2026 on SpaceX’s Transporter-18 rideshare mission by the Ukrainian company HIMERA together with GomSpace, a Danish small-satellite manufacturer.
Key facts
- The satellite: OBRIA NANO, described by EADaily as the first test satellite of a future independent Ukrainian communications network, now “testing the capabilities of the OBRIA constellation according to plan.”
- Who built and launched it: HIMERA of Ukraine with GomSpace of Denmark; EADaily does not describe the division of work or the contract behind it.
- Ride to orbit: SpaceX’s Transporter-18 mission on 1 October 2026, per EADaily.
- Stated ambition: a constellation covering the whole of Ukraine and complementing, not replacing, European satellite networks.
- Industrial step: at the next stage, HIMERA says it plans to localise production of satellites and ground terminals in Ukraine.
- Corroboration status: single source, reported 26 days after the launch date it gives.
What could not be corroborated
Three documents would settle this story, and none has surfaced: an announcement on HIMERA’s own channels, a GomSpace customer or mission release, or a Transporter-18 payload listing naming OBRIA NANO. HIMERA’s co-founder and chief executive, Misha Rudominsky, is quoted at length by EADaily — the project is “an opportunity to lay the foundation for an independent communication network for Ukraine”, he says, with the long-term aim of strengthening strategic security and reducing dependence on external communications providers — yet the agency links to nothing from the company carrying those words.
The timing is part of the same problem. If HIMERA or GomSpace had publicised the milestone when it happened, there would have been no 26-day gap for a secondary portal to fill. Two readings fit: either neither company chose to announce a military-adjacent payload, in which case wartime operational security is the likely reason and the detail reaching a Russian-audience outlet first is itself notable; or the launch claim originated downstream of the companies altogether. EADaily offers no explanation for the delay, and until one of the three primary documents appears, the claim that Ukraine now has a satellite of its own in orbit remains unverified.
What it would mean for satellite internet in Ukraine
Assume the report is accurate. One test spacecraft is still the first rung of a very long ladder. A constellation covering a country the size of Ukraine needs dozens of satellites at minimum, ground stations, licensed spectrum, and a terminal supply chain — and HIMERA’s stated next step, building satellites and user terminals domestically, is a multi-year industrial programme rather than a procurement. Nothing in the report changes Starlink availability in Ukraine, or the Starlink price that households, businesses and donor governments currently pay for terminals and service, on any 2026 or 2027 horizon. Existing Starlink dishes remain the working link.
The word doing the most work is “complementing”. A network framed as serving strategic security objectives and operating under a state-designated operator points to military, government and critical-infrastructure traffic first; consumer satellite internet, if it comes, comes later and probably as resale over European capacity rather than as a competing retail tariff. That is the same sequencing visible in a sovereign rival to Starlink by 2028 and in wider moves in Europe and Canada to cut reliance on US satellite services: sovereignty programmes are bought by states as insurance against a supplier switching off, not by consumers chasing a cheaper monthly bill.
There is also the dependency the launch itself illustrates. By EADaily’s own account, Ukraine’s first step away from Starlink flew on a rocket owned by Starlink’s operator — a constraint Canada’s own Starlink alternative still rides on SpaceX rockets for. Launch capacity, not satellite manufacturing, is where the bottleneck sits for everyone building an alternative.
The wider satellite contest around the war
EADaily sets the launch against its own earlier reporting on a Russian system. It cites Sergei “Flash” Beskrestnov, an adviser to President Zelensky on defence technology, telling the Associated Press that within about six months Russia will be able to manage Geraniums in real time through the Rassvet satellite network, which EADaily calls the Russian analogue of Starlink. On that account, full coverage would also let Russian operators control reconnaissance drones and cheap missiles such as Banderol and Dan-M in real time. The agency offers no independent confirmation of the six-month estimate and no comparison of Rassvet’s capacity, coverage or terminals with Starlink’s.
What the report leaves open
Beyond the sourcing, the specifics are absent. The report does not name the Ukrainian operator that will control OBRIA NANO; gives no satellite mass, payload or expected service life; and sets out no schedule, satellite count, orbit, frequency band or budget for either the constellation or the domestic production stage. It does not say how long the test campaign runs or what results have come back, does not state whether consumers are a market at all, and puts no cost to Ukraine on any of it. For readers outside Europe, there is nothing on coverage, resale or regulatory filings in any other region.
What to watch
Three developments would move this from claim to programme: a HIMERA or GomSpace publication confirming the launch and OBRIA NANO’s test results; a named Ukrainian operator holding the licence; and a contract or site for the domestic satellite and terminal production. Until then the verifiable core is narrower than the headline — a single rideshare payload, reported by one outlet, in a test campaign described only as proceeding to plan.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is OBRIA NANO a military satellite?
EADaily does not describe it as a weapons-related payload. It says OBRIA NANO will operate under the control of a Ukrainian operator and will serve Ukraine’s strategic security objectives, but the report does not name that operator or list the satellite’s payloads.
Who has called Ukraine’s reliance on Starlink a vulnerability?
EADaily points to military historian Peter Caddick-Adams, who told The Telegraph that the Ukrainian armed forces’ critical dependence on Starlink satellite communications has become their main strategic vulnerability on the battlefield. According to EADaily, he compared the situation with the lessons of the Second World War.
How much satellite coverage does Russia’s Rassvet network have over Ukraine now?
Sergei “Flash” Beskrestnov, Zelensky’s adviser on defence technology, told the Associated Press that Russia currently gets temporary coverage of 30 to 40 minutes when its satellites pass over Ukrainian territory, as reported by EADaily.
![Using Your Own Router with Starlink: Bypass Mode [2026]](https://starlink-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/using-your-own-router-with-starlink-bypass-mode-20-f6c09f95-120x86.png)
